No major party in the UK backed Jean-Claude Juncker, or any other ‘Spitzenkandidat’. It is therefore fair to say that the UK electorate had no influence over the course of what some describe as an ‘election’.
The counter-charge is that David Cameron is to blame because he ‘left’ the main centre-right group – the European People’s Party (EPP). Former Lib Dem leader Charles Kennedy made this point yesterday in the Commons – which was also alluded to by Labour MPs. If Cameron was a member, so the argument goes, he could have blocked Juncker’s appointment as the candidate and then had some say over the ‘election campaign’ and associated deals. Critics are zooming in on the meeting of EPP-affiliated leaders in Dublin in early March, at which Juncker was selected (behind closed doors no less).
It may not be that simple though:
- The Conservative Party was never a member of the EPP. It was a member of the European Democrats (ED) that was linked to the EPP in the so-called EPP-ED. As such, the Tories didn’t have offical ‘voting rights’ and therefore David Cameron would not have had a vote over Juncker’s appointment.
- It’s also worth noting that the Labour Party, although being a member of the S&D group failed to block Martin Schulz as their group’s Spitzenkandidaten.
- Likewise the Liberal Democrats failed to block Guy Verhofstadt as the ALDE candidate
There’s an argument that Cameron could have used the political influence and clout garnered from being associated with the EPP to stop Jucnker, even absent a formal vote. However, other EPP leaders had limited influence on the EPP candidate. Sweden’s Moderaterna were opposed but were over-ruled. Berlusconi failed to attend and Hungary’s Orban was hostile.
For the record this is how the EPP delegates voted to adopt Juncker, so Cameron’s vote would have made little difference – but again, we won’t know:
|EPP delegate votes to adopt Juncker as candidate|